[rules-users] Mocking Guvnor

[Michael Anstis]

Sounds like your service uses KnowledgeAgent that detects changes to rules
in Guvnor based upon a changeset?

Either way your requirement remains the same: *your* application
architecture needs to support (at least) the ability to provide different
changesets (for testing you can use a changeset that points to a local
folder containing rules rather than Guvnor).

You're not going to be able to avoid mocking some part of your application
if you don't want to get rules from Guvnor (although I prefer the term
pluggable - CDI use of @Specialises or @Alternative would be a good
example, but IDK if you use CDI).

Sent on the move
On 8 Aug 2014 18:03, "san_hegde" <santhosh.hegde at hp.com> wrote:

>  Actually during functional testing we want to test our service which in
> turn calls rules and we want to test the service with changing rules.  But
> we do not want to change the rules in Guvnor rather we want to somehow mock
> it.  Means depending on our tests we want to use different modified rules.
> For this if we can mock the session or guvnor or somehow so that we session
> can return the mocked fact depending on our test.
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Santhosh Hegde A
>
>
>
> *From:* Stephen Masters [via Drools] [mailto:ml-node+[hidden email]
> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4030609&i=0>]
> *Sent:* Friday, August 08, 2014 9:10 PM
> *To:* Ajekar, Santhosh Hegde (HP-IT)
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Mocking Guvnor
>
>
>
> Possibly also worth pointing out that inserting a fact and executing a
> session do not connect to Guvnor anyway?
>
>
>
> Although, as Mike mentions, the simplest approach tends to be to create a
> service which wraps knowledge base access and mock that. Although you could
> also mock the session.
>
>
>
> Although, I must admit I’m not sure what question is being asked...
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8 Aug 2014, at 13:07, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]
> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4030608&i=0>> wrote:
>
>
>
>  I assume you have a service encapsulating your use of Drools?
>
>
>
> Why not mock this service to use an implementation that returns what you
> need?
>
>
>
> On 8 August 2014 03:13, san_hegde <[hidden email]
> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4030608&i=1>> wrote:
>
>  Hi ,
>
>
>
> We have requirement where in during functional testing we do not want to
> connect to Guvnor rather want to mock it.
>
>
>
> For example mocking could be like this.
>
>
>
>                 We send Fact object as input during calling
> knowledgeSession.execute() method and in rule we update the result in that
> fact object itself. So here can we mock the output fact object, so that
> during functional testing we no need to connect to Guvnor rather mocked
> result fact object is returned.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Santhosh Hegde A
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> View this message in context: Mocking Guvnor
> <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Mocking-Guvnor-tp4030601.html>
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive
> <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-User-forum-f47000.html> at
> Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4030608&i=2>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4030608&i=3>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4030608&i=4>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>  ------------------------------
>
> *If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:*
>
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Mocking-Guvnor-tp4030601p4030608.html
>
> To start a new topic under Drools: User forum, email [hidden email]
> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4030609&i=1>
> To unsubscribe from Drools: User forum, click here.
> NAML
> <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
> ------------------------------
> View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] Mocking Guvnor
> <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Mocking-Guvnor-tp4030601p4030609.html>
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive
> <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-User-forum-f47000.html> at
> Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20140808/b8e19729/attachment-0001.html