[rules-users] "in" syntax breaking the Rete Tree
Wolfgang Laun
wolfgang.laun at gmail.com
Fri Feb 21 06:49:23 EST 2014
On 21/02/2014, droolster <quant.coder at gmail.com> wrote:
> For developers
> who are new to Drools (like me), one of the assurances we get that our
> rules
> are properly defined is the Rete viewer. If the Rete Viewer shows errors,
> then it gives doubts about whether the rules are properly defined. In my
Are we talking about the same view, i.e., the canvas where garishly
coloured blobs are shown? I would not trust this, either way. There is
the parser, for syntax errors. As for logical errors, there are formal
methods (difficult) and tests (...).
> case, the rules still function correctly but if I am going take my rule
> engine into a Production environment I want all the assurances I can get.
True, but there are better ways indeed.
-W
More information about the rules-users
mailing list