[rules-users] Some basic questions/assumptions on Drools Work-bench/Guvnor

[Michael Anstis]

1) Correct
2) Correct
3) Correct
4) Correct
5) Correct

Your assumptions are spot on.


On 4 March 2014 23:22, mattmadhavan <mmadhavan at facs.org> wrote:

> Hello,
> I have some basic questions on the Drools workbench. Can some one please
> validate my assumptions?
>
> 1) Drools workbench/Guvnor is not a replacement for Eclipse.
> 2) Geeks like me develop the applications in Eclipse
> 3) Drools workbench will be mainly used by the Rule authors (Business
> Analysts etc) once I set it up for them.
> 4) The anslysts will author the rules and test it in the workbench.
> 5) They will build the DRLs into a jar  and I include it as a dependency in
> my POM.xml.
>
> How close am I to these assumptions?
>
> Thanks
> Matt'M
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Some-basic-questions-assumptions-on-Drools-Work-bench-Guvnor-tp4028509.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20140305/815d757a/attachment.html