[rules-users] Drools Case Based Reasoning

gboro54 gboro54 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 18 13:28:36 EDT 2014


That is correct and that is my thought. My company I feel likes to over
complicate things at times. My thought would be to use drools queries to
handle the searching of previous cases for the solution. Does that seem like
a reasonable approach? 


laune wrote
> CBR as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case-based_reasoning?
> 
> If the number of identical variables, added with weights, is the
> target function, a simple search strategy should be sufficient for
> finding the best past case.
> 
> -W
> 
> 
> On 18/03/2014, gboro54 <

> gboro54@

> > wrote:
>> This sounds like something that could be accomplished with Planner. Is
>> that
>> the case or am I completely off the mark here? My company is looking at
>> technologies to do case base planning and since we already use drools for
>> other business rules figure I would poke around
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Case-Based-Reasoning-tp4028784.html
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> 

> rules-users at .jboss

>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list

> rules-users at .jboss

> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users





--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Case-Based-Reasoning-tp4028784p4028786.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


More information about the rules-users mailing list