[rules-users] Not and forall operator behaviour

[rogerL]

Davide,

Thank you for the clarification. My error was to interpret the "not"
operator as an existential function (ie: "there is no such object that
exists") and viewing the object as a unit, rather than, as you pointed out,
logically manipulable.
In light of that, the logical OR in place of the comma makes sense.

Roger 



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Not-and-forall-operator-behaviour-tp4029761p4029764.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.