<div dir="ltr"><br> Michael,<br><br> Drools 5 is not production ready yet, specially because we are still working in the new major features like CEP and processes, but the 4.x equivalent features all work. We still eventually break tests in trunk while working on the new stuff, but you can most of the time simply ignore the broken tests. Also, if your research project is not expected to be final in the next month or so, by the time you finish your project we will have Drools 5 final out.<br>
<br> BTW, can you talk about about the subject of your research?<br><br> Edson<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/9/12 Michael Zimmermann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:list@incunabulum.de">list@incunabulum.de</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi Edson,<br>
<br>
thanks for the quick reply...<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
Edson Tirelli wrote:<br>
> It depends if you are talking about Drools 4 or 5. You are right<br>
> about Drools 4. Drools 5 has "quasi-pluggable" operators... hehehe :)<br>
<br>
</div>Sorry, didn't mention it. I was talking about the 4.0.x series. This<br>
leads to the following.<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> For more info, look at the EvaluatorDefinition interface in Drools 5<br>
> and its several implementations for examples.<br>
<br>
</div>Well, how stable and usable (eclipse integration?) is drools 5? (I am<br>
using the drools rule engine mostly; not the BRMS)<br>
<br>
While I may not need top notch stability and can cope with some changes<br>
to the codebase over time ( research project ), Drools only is one part<br>
of a pretty complicated application. So far, this was the major reason<br>
for not having a closer look in the new version.<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> BTW, most important thing that I forgot to mention: we obviously are<br>
> interested in feedback and contributions on the feature, from simple<br>
> ideas and suggestions to actual patches and improvements!<br>
<br>
</div>Well, we agree here. The previous two posts were ment to start some<br>
discussion. Now - as I need this feature rather sooner than later - I am<br>
looking into the implementation. JIRA ticket with more will follow if I<br>
am sucessfull.<br>
<br>
cu, Michael<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>
rules-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br> Edson Tirelli<br> JBoss Drools Core Development<br> JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ <a href="http://www.jboss.com">www.jboss.com</a><br>
</div>