<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
By your given criteria, due to price, I don't think we have any
competition :)<br>
<br>
Mark<br>
Lindy hagan wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:54d39bc60904171128t11497d6av1caf875f9097b393@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">I'm wondering if anybody has comparison info with other
engines. I just started to evaluate the products<br>
not sure which factors to consider. But I have these requirements:<br>
<br>
Must Be<br>
1)Free or inexpensive product.<br>
2)Rules change frequently, level of effort should be minimum.<br>
3)Multiple join condition (A rule is determined ranging from 1 to 10
data fields.)<br>
4)Should support approximately 75 rules.<br>
<br>
Better if we have.<br>
1)Change Rules dynamically if possible.<br>
2)Ease of use for Business users and developers.<br>
3)Rule versioning.<br>
<br>
Will be happy if any one can send me rule comparison document or
suggest me which tools can i use to evaluate.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Lindy<br>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>