That I don't know, sorry! Maybe have a look at the drools JIRA page, see if the issue has been discussed?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:10 PM, cwolfinger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chase.wolfinger@gmail.com">chase.wolfinger@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
Yes. But the collection I am testing has Integer objects it is the object of<br>
the comparison for containment that is an int primitive. So my thoughts are<br>
if this would never work unless I use an eval then why does the rules parser<br>
allow the creation of condition that is invalid?<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://n3.nabble.com/Question-on-contains-operator-with-integer-tp440559p442221.html" target="_blank">http://n3.nabble.com/Question-on-contains-operator-with-integer-tp440559p442221.html</a><br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rules-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Enda J Diggins<br>