<font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">He means the latest of the latest version, released last week or so. Not the one you're using, apparently.</font></font><div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"><br>
</font></font><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/4/9 Bertrand Grottier <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:b_grottier@hotmail.com">b_grottier@hotmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>
<br><br><hr>Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:56:35 -0700<br>From: <a href="mailto:greg_barton@yahoo.com" target="_blank">greg_barton@yahoo.com</a><div class="im"><br>To: <a href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
</div>Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools vs OPSJ<br><br><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="font:inherit" valign="top"><div class="im">>What version of drools did you use? <br></div>Drools 5.0.1.<div class="im">
<br><br><br>>Did you use a version with the "true modify" feature?<br></div>I feel sorry but I do not understand your question.<br>I did not make any particular tuning.<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><br>
<br><br>--- On <b>Thu, 4/8/10, Bertrand Grottier <i><<a href="mailto:b_grottier@hotmail.com" target="_blank">b_grottier@hotmail.com</a>></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px"><br>From: Bertrand Grottier <<a href="mailto:b_grottier@hotmail.com" target="_blank">b_grottier@hotmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: [rules-users] Drools vs OPSJ<br>To: <a href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>Date: Thursday, April 8, 2010, 2:08 AM<br><br><div>
Hello,<br><br>At the present time, I am evaluating Drools vs OPSJ.<br><br>Before I started, I had a look at the following tests: <a href="http://blogs.illation.com.au/2009/09/waltz-benchmark-performance-opsj-vs-drools/" target="_blank">http://blogs.illation.com.au/2009/09/waltz-benchmark-performance-opsj-vs-drools/</a>. Based on these tests, I was expecting better performances from OPSJ over Drools regarding the rule firing time.<br>
However, I obtained opposite results on a basic test. It consists in a sort of "join clause": I have a few products and many potentiel prices (10^4) in the knowledge session. The aim is to "match" the appropriate prices to each products.<br>
<br>My question are the followings: <br>- Does someone obtained similar results ? <br>- Are there situations where Drools outperforms OPSJ ? (apparently yes).<br><br>Thank you in advance.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>Benoît<br>
<br><hr>Commander un cadeau en ligne discrètement? <a rel="nofollow" href="http://clk.atdmt.com/FRM/go/207186971/direct/01/" target="_blank">Voir la
solution offerte par Internet Explorer8</a>
</div><br>-----Inline Attachment Follows-----<br><br><div>_______________________________________________<br>rules-users mailing list<br><a href="http:///mc/compose?to=rules-users@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a><br></div></blockquote></div></div></td></tr></tbody></table><br> <br><hr>Acheter en ligne en toute sécurité ? <a href="http://clk.atdmt.com/FRM/go/206608211/direct/01/" target="_blank">Internet Explorer 8 vous protège gratuitement !</a></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
rules-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"To understand what is recursion you must first understand recursion"<br>
</div>