<font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">oh!</font></font><div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"><br></font></font></div><div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">I'm so sorry... typos in XML are impossible to detect :( </font></font></div>
<div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">Again, thank you so much for your help. I'll correct this and will use the agenda-groups the way you suggested.</font></font></div><div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"><br>
</font></font></div><div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">_ miguel</font></font></div><div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"><br></font></font></div><div><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"><br>
</font></font><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Wolfgang Laun <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wolfgang.laun@gmail.com">wolfgang.laun@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
How did you specify the agenda group in the XML? There aren't much<br>
checks being done in XML handling, so it's easy to slip up. Here's how<br>
I interpret the XML schema:<br>
<br>
<rule name="myrule"><br>
<rule-attribute name="agenda-group" value="group42"/><br>
...<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-W<br>
</font><div class="im"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
2010/5/5 miguel machado <<a href="mailto:mls.machado@gmail.com">mls.machado@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">> Hi,<br>
> Yeah, i think this might be a bug indeed. I just tried converting to DRL<br>
> using the "dumper" and the agenda-group item doesn't show up in the<br>
> generated DRL file. It is possible that that this tag isn't being<br>
> interpreted for the same reason it isn't being converted into the DRL<br>
> format. Can someone please confirm this?<br>
> Anyway, if this doesn't work.. is there any kind of workaround? Maybe using<br>
> ruleflow-group's or any other technique?<br>
> Thank you.<br>
> _ miguel<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Wolfgang Laun <<a href="mailto:wolfgang.laun@gmail.com">wolfgang.laun@gmail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> If you don't have auto-focus, rules from other agenda groups should not<br>
>> fire.<br>
>> XML should not matter. A bug might be possible, e.g., due to<br>
>> misinterpretation<br>
>> of the rules in XML.<br>
>> -W<br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> "To understand what is recursion you must first understand recursion"<br>
><br>
</div></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">> _______________________________________________<br>
> rules-users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a><br>
><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rules-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"To understand what is recursion you must first understand recursion"<br>
</div>