HA as in High Availability, I suppose. <br><br>SW alone won't make it HA. Does your application warrant <a href="http://s.th">s.th</a>. like 2oo3 or similar? Running such a system with an application based on Drools will require some middleware for messaging which is clearly out of scope for Drools. Some support may be there for such features as recovery, if you need 4-9 or similar.<br>
<br>-W<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/9/21 Thomas Peuß <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:thomas.peuss@nterra.com">thomas.peuss@nterra.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<p><font size="2">Hello!<br>
<br>
We are thinking about using Drools Fusion 5.1 for Complex Event Processing. We have a prototype running that consumes events from a Tibco JMS server. Everything works as expected. My boss is now asking about HA features that are available. I have read the documentation and found nearly nothing about HA features. In the case of Fusion you have long running threads working on fireUntilHalt(). So when the node goes down you loose all the events that live in the ksession memory. What possibilities do you see to run Fusion in an HA environment?<br>
<br>
Thanks for your ideas<br><font color="#888888">
Thomas</font></font>
</p>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
rules-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>