Have a look here: <a href="http://www.drdobbs.com/184405218">http://www.drdobbs.com/184405218</a><br><br>here: <a href="http://blog.athico.com/2007/07/sequential-rete.html">http://blog.athico.com/2007/07/sequential-rete.html</a><br>
<br>and here: <a href="http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/guidelines.shtml">http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/guidelines.shtml</a><br><br>The easy answer for your question is "Yes" ;-)<br><br>Cheers,<br>Leo.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
2010/9/24 Harshit Bapna <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hrbapna@gmail.com">hrbapna@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi All,<br><br>In a scenario where lets say 10 rule are to be fired (in any order) in a stateless session than will I get the benefits of RETE algorithm (i.e increased performance).<br>i.e Whether the engine will fire all the ten results in a parallel fashion or Whether the engine will file each rule one by one.<br>
<br>How RETE algorithm will improve the performance of the engine for rules fired in stateless session ?<br><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
rules-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>