Yes, I was talking about a dummy object that must be inserted before the Rule Node. <br>Your rules then should use this object at its first restriction, but there is no need to modify it. Ej:<br><br>when<br> Guard()<br> ....<br>
then<br> ....<br>end<br><br>The low-salience rule I was talking about is meant to clean up the session.<br><br>Best Regards,<br> <br clear="all"><br>XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX<br><br>Esteban Aliverti<br>- Developer @ <a href="http://www.plugtree.com" target="_blank">http://www.plugtree.com </a><br>
- Blog @ <a href="http://ilesteban.wordpress.com" target="_blank">http://ilesteban.wordpress.com</a><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:00 AM, HMandic <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:trbuhom@net.hr">trbuhom@net.hr</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hmmm, that could be it!<br>
<br>
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by that "guard" object. Would that<br>
mean that I should insert some dummy object in a script node (action node)<br>
before my rule node and change its value inside this rule, so the rule could<br>
be triggered when the second and third instance of sub-process reach it?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-sub-process-rules-inside-multiple-instances-tp3009981p3010606.html" target="_blank">http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-sub-process-rules-inside-multiple-instances-tp3009981p3010606.html</a><br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rules-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>