Hi,<br><br>AFAIK derivation queries are the only way to achieve backwards chaining.<br><br>Furthermore, your suspicion is correct: Guvnor does not support BC at present however we obviously plan to provide for it.<br><br>With kind regards,<br>
<br>Mike<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 2 August 2011 05:19, johnysums <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:johnysums@yahoo.com">johnysums@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hello,<br>
<br>
My previous post didnt get the attention i was hoping for, so i decided to<br>
ask once more. Are derivation queries the only way to use backward chaining?<br>
If so, then it is (at least for now) impossible to implement backward<br>
chaining rules in guvnor, correct?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Backward-chaining-again-tp3217917p3217917.html" target="_blank">http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Backward-chaining-again-tp3217917p3217917.html</a><br>
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rules-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>