On 31 October 2011 17:06, arrehman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:arrehman73@yahoo.com">arrehman73@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I have /update()/ on consequence/action part of rules, which I can't void. </blockquote><div><br>It seems to me that you are contradicting yourself. If you can't remove<br>update() then this means that you do need the changes to facts being<br>
made known to the rules engine so that it can fire rules (again), due to<br>changes made. This is the only purpose of an update() call; changes to<br>the Java object are made by setter calls, as always.<br><br>-W<br> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I<br>
guess there is no way and rule engine is doing the right thing then.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rule-fires-several-times-tp3466250p3468183.html" target="_blank">http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rule-fires-several-times-tp3466250p3468183.html</a><br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rules-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>