2012/1/2 Esteban Aliverti <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com">esteban.aliverti@gmail.com</a>></span><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex">The verifier code does not address the extraction of specific fields or values</blockquote>
<div>This is true if you use the out-of-the-box set of verification rules. Good thing about drools-verifier is that you can define your own verifications rules using drl. </div><br></blockquote><div>I was addressing the (unstable) validator API, not the rules that come with the validator, not the rules.<br>
<br>Writing your own rules on the rule data model can be fairly simple (e.g., to detect the presence of a pattern for some type) or downright difficult (e.g., for locating some logical contradiction).<br><br>Also note that collecting a (management) report adds a pinch of salt to your rule set as compared to the mere detection of this or that circumstance.<br>
<br>-W<br> <br></div></div>