<div dir="ltr">No, but in master (i.e. unreleased) if you defined dependent enumerations and one value of a parent doesn't have a dependent enumeration defined it falls back to show a widget for the underlying data-type.<div>
<br></div><div>For example:-</div><div><br></div><div>Car.fuel = ["Diesel", "Petrol"]</div><div>Car[fuel=Diesel] = ["BIO", "REGULAR"]</div><div><br></div><div>Selecting Car, Fuel=Diesel would show a list box for "BIO" and "REGULAR".</div>
<div>Selecting Car, Fuel=Petrol would show a text box.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>If you use a template or decision table and leave the textbox empty the constraint will not be included in the resulting DRL.</div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 21 February 2014 14:57, SrjTx <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:clickthex@yahoo.com" target="_blank">clickthex@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I know that you can have one dropdown control the contents of another<br>
dropdown, but can a dropdown control the whether another dropdown or other<br>
{} field is displayed at all?<br>
<br>
ie. If you pick car, then the "bed length" dropdown would not be shown.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/6-0-1-F-Can-this-be-done-with-enumerations-tp4028233.html" target="_blank">http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/6-0-1-F-Can-this-be-done-with-enumerations-tp4028233.html</a><br>
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rules-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>