[seam-dev] please update your POM version

[Dan Allen]

You'll notice that Weld uses this convention also.

-Dan

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Module leads,
>
> When doing releases, we need to align our version numbering scheme.
> Currently, we are using one scheme in Maven artifacts (3.0.0-Alpha1) and one
> scheme for downloads (e.g., 3.0.0.Alpha1). Personally, I wouldn't care which
> one we use, as long as we use a single scheme. However, it turns out the
> JBoss has recently established a guideline for version numbers and I think
> we should follow suit.
>
> http://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning
>
> major.minor.micro.Alpha[n]
> major.minor.micro.Beta[n]
> major.minor.micro.CR[n]
> major.minor.micro.Final
>
> So, if there are no objections, when doing a Seam 3 module release, please
> use the format 3.x.y.Qualifier[n]. There are some
> other conventions suggested on that page that you may find useful.
>
> Thanks!
>
> <http://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning>-Dan
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>



-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20100330/40f530a1/attachment-0001.html