[seam-dev] Status check!

Brian Leathem bleathem at gmail.com
Fri Jan 28 18:32:37 EST 2011


Good idea!

Or something like either:
<version>[3.0.0.Beta2,3.0.1)</version>
or
<version>[3.0.0.Beta2,3.1)</version>

That way breaking changes if bound to a version increment, would then 
require modules to re-release.

Brian

On 01/28/2011 03:25 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> Have we considered using version range specifiers via the maven 
> artifact syntax?
>
> If modules used something like:
>
> <version>[3.0.0.Beta2,)</version>
>
> It would allow more flexibility as we go along / upgrade individual 
> modules. This way we wouldn't need to re-release *everything* when we 
> re-release *one* thing. WDYT? I'm sure there are consequences, but 
> others may have ideas too.
>
> ~Lincoln



More information about the seam-dev mailing list