[seam-dev] Issues with testing and emma

[José Rodolfo Freitas]

Hi john, aslak provided us an extension to integrate arquillian with jacoco.

https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-jacoco

we´ve been testing it and it´s working well.

Emma uses offline bytecode instrumentation, and this could be a really
hellish to analyzes coverage data over the container.

I believe that the best approach in our case (using arquillian) would be


On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:19 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> wrote:
> I just noticed this morning that emma reports very low code coverage on my
> code.  However, when I switch the injection points from say "SomeBean" to
> "SomeBeanImpl" then my code coverage sudden jumps up.  I expect it to be
> higher.  It seems like Emma has some issues dealing with CDI proxies, or
> possibly arquillian.  Has anyone else noticed this?
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>