[seam-dev] Seam 3.1 CR1 this week

[Stuart Douglas]

You should actually be checking for more states than just ACTIVE (e.g. it could be MARKED_ROLLBACK).

Anything other than UNKOWN or NO_TRANSACTION I think.

Stuart



On 29/11/2011, at 8:15 AM, Nicklas Karlsson wrote:

> Sure, it's just something like  http://pastebin.com/7ZBMcYkG 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> wrote:
> Would you mind sharing that with us Nick? :)
> 
> 
> On 29/11/11 07:08, Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
>> 
>> Like I commented in the JIRA, I think I also had this issue and Stuart recommended this simple rollback filter which I currently use and appear to have solved the issue.
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> wrote:
>> So it looks like the filter idea is what Jason and Lincoln have come up
>> with also.  Jason, how long would this take to implement?
>> 
>> On 29/11/11 07:02, Stuart Douglas wrote:
>> > This looks like a transaction leak, not sure where from.
>> >
>> > EE app servers are supposed to have a mechanism in place to detect and rollback leaking transactions from a web request. AS 7.0 was missing this, however I added it for the 7.1 Beta release.
>> >
>> > For 7.0 I think the only real solution is to either figure out where the TX leak is coming from, or write a filter that detects transaction leaks and rolls back.
>> >
>> > Stuart
>> >
>> >
>> > On 29/11/2011, at 7:54 AM, Shane Bryzak wrote:
>> >
>> >> Has someone consulted Stuart about this issue?
>> >>
>> >> On 29/11/11 03:29, Jason Porter wrote:
>> >>> That may work. If the steps are relatively small to recreate it.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>>
>> >>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 10:16, Cody Lerum<cody.lerum at gmail.com>   wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I don't have a test for it, and I don't think I will have the time to
>> >>>> learn how to repo it in arq anytime soon. I can branch my seam-crm
>> >>>> project to create an easy repo if someone can craft a test based on
>> >>>> that.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -C
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Jason Porter<lightguard.jp at gmail.com>   wrote:
>> >>>>> Cody, do you have an arquillian test that reproduces this? This is a pretty big one and I don't want to say this is fixed without a test demonstrating this is fixed.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 9:24, Cody Lerum<cody.lerum at gmail.com>   wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> FWIW I think we should hold off on a CR1 release until
>> >>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAM-99 can be resolved.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> -C
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Shane Bryzak<sbryzak at redhat.com>   wrote:
>> >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> We are gearing up release Seam 3.1.0.CR1 in a couple of days.  Currently we
>> >>>>>>> have 56 open issues [1], I'll probably be bumping many of these but if you
>> >>>>>>> are able to help out by fixing one or two of these then it would be much
>> >>>>>>> appreciated.  I'll probably start the release on Wednesday evening my time
>> >>>>>>> (+10GMT), so we'll need to have a code freeze by then.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>> Shane
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> [1]
>> >>>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12314291
>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>> >>>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>> >>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> seam-dev mailing list
>> >> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> ---
>> Nik
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ---
> Nik

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20111129/8d64a48f/attachment-0001.html