FYI<div><br></div><div>Jira Git Support: <a href="https://plugins.atlassian.com/plugin/details/4984">https://plugins.atlassian.com/plugin/details/4984</a><div>FishEye Git Support: <a href="http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/FE-337">http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/FE-337</a></div>
<div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/11/25 Pete Muir <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pmuir@redhat.com">pmuir@redhat.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
On 24 Nov 2009, at 18:34, <a href="http://lightguard.jp" target="_blank">lightguard.jp</a>@<a href="http://gmail.com" target="_blank">gmail.com</a> wrote:<br>
> I've looked at both and the one major difference is the branching model in hg. Many people have coined it "broken" but those may all be in the past. As far as tooling goes I think you'll find decent support either way. Would Fisheye and JIRA still be used or would the services of the host be used instead? That may also be something to consider.<br>
<br>
</div>We would continue to use JIRA. I guess we wouldn't use fisheye anymore.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
weld-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org">weld-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>--<br>Aslak Knutsen; +47 952 38 791; fax +47 22 33 60 24<br>Kongens gate 14; Boks 805 Sentrum, 0104 Oslo;<br><a href="http://www.conduct.no">http://www.conduct.no</a>; mailto:<a href="mailto:aslak@conduct.no">aslak@conduct.no</a><br>
<br>Conduct AS - Professional Open Source Services<br>- Red Hat/JBoss Premier System Integrator<br>- Pentaho Preferred Integration Partner<br>- Atlassian Technology Partner<br>
</div></div>