<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><br>
We should move ahead with creating a Weld website based on the Seam<br>
Wiki infrastructure. I really don't know what the holdup is.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div>The migration of Weld content is a separate, but important discussion. It's not a good use of Seam development team resources to maintain another site. We are not system administrators. We have people in that role and we'd like to use them. It also deepens the schism between us and the JBoss Community, a community which many of our members and contributors are a part of.</div>
<div><br></div><div>What we are waiting on is for JBoss Community to be upgraded to meet the feature requests that we identified as prerequisites for a migration of Weld content (Each migration analysis is being handled as a separate concern).</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Dan</div><div> </div></div>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>