<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Pete Muir <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pmuir@redhat.com">pmuir@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Ok.<br>
<br>
Bear in mind Juven @ Sonatype is actively working on getting the <a href="http://java.net" target="_blank">java.net</a> repo sync'd to Maven central now. I'm not sure of the ETA on it (every email I get on the subject says "coming soon" ;-), so if we can wait a few weeks, everything will be there.<br>
<br>
I would much prefer to stick with using the javax.faces:jsf-api dependency if possible. We can alternatively introduce a JBoss Java EE namespaced jsf-api.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Sounds good. As long as we have motion, which it seems like we have on two fronts, that's good. I'll see Jason tonight at dinner, so I'll see if he is willing to share some more info regarding this migration :) He told me about it at DevNexus in March, but at the time it sounded like they were dealing with some roadblocks.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Dan</div><div> </div></div>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>