<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Stuart Douglas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stuart@baileyroberts.com.au">stuart@baileyroberts.com.au</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I don't particularly like the idea of @Veto being an @Alternative stereotype, I think it should veto the bean. Also there is not really that much difference between typing @Veto and @Alternative anyway, and @Alternative is clearer as it is part of the spec.<br>
<br>
Also implementing @Veto as a stereotype would prevent the bean being specialized in seam-xml, as seam-xml would apply the @Veto stereotype to the configured bean.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Good points. I'm not sure why I thought making it an @Alternative was the right approach. Now that I think about it more, it doesn't make much sense. I am still interested in having a declarative veto mechanism built-in somewhere.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Dan</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>