<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 19:10, Shane Bryzak <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sbryzak@redhat.com">sbryzak@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I'd rather keep everything related to a single module contained within a<br>
single group. Having artifacts spread across multiple groups doesn't<br>
seem tidy to me.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>A lot of projects do this, including Weld and RichFaces. It helps people understand what the core artifacts are and what are auxiliary things (in this case examples). I don't think we need the breakdown that Weld does, which is to have subpackages for each UI technology, but having an "examples" folder does make a lot of sense, imho.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Plus, then the artifacts can be named like "rest-tasks" (in all, org.jboss.seam.rest.examples:rest-tasks) <- feel free to revise that scheme.</div><div><br></div><div>-Dan</div><div> </div>
</div>-- <br><div>Dan Allen</div>Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><div><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br></div><br>