<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:19, Michael Schütz <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:michaelschuetz83@gmail.com">michaelschuetz83@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi to all,<br><br>why is asynchronous interceptor "client-typed" ?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I believe the idea here is to defer the call to the EJB (as the type is only relevant when the interceptor is applied to an EJB). In fact, the client/server distinction is whether the interceptor is applied before delegating to the EJB proxy or whether the interceptor participates in the interceptor chain that's handled by the EJB container. So it's really a subtle concern.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Dan</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br><div>Dan Allen</div>Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><div><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br></div><br>