On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:10, Antoine Sabot-Durand <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net">antoine@sabot-durand.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Thanks a lot Marek,<br>
<br>
Yes it greatly helps : you're my Hero :-). I was far from the truth. I'll try this tonight.<br>
BTW will there be something more convenient to define the deployment archive in Arquillian ? Am I the only one to find it a bit fastidious like this ?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Rest assured you are not the first to ask. Part of it is that Arquillian requires a different way of thinking. It's harder to setup because all the integration test frameworks were just working in a monolithic way. We have been discussing the possibility of adding wider globs, such as all the classes in the project using a built-in reference. The other part of it is that the first test you write is always the hardest, because you have to define all the foundation stuff. Then you can refactor that into a static helper on which you build. And it becomes much more straightforward.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I hate having to say it's hard for a reason, but there is a good reason. My hope is that we find the right balance as time goes on. The Seam team plays a vital role as users of Arquillian to help steer it as needed.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Dan</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br><div>Dan Allen</div>Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><div><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br></div><br>