[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1160) EMF implicit lookup/resolve precedence
Christian Bauer (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Tue Apr 10 06:22:58 EDT 2007
EMF implicit lookup/resolve precedence
--------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-1160
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1160
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Core
Reporter: Christian Bauer
Currently impossible to use WAR deployment and Unit testing. Only way to configure it is as follows:
<core:managed-persistence-context name="entityManager"
auto-create="true"
entity-manager-factory="#{wikiEntityManagerFactory}"
persistence-unit-jndi-name="java:/EntityManagerFactories/wiki">
</core:managed-persistence-context>
<core:entity-manager-factory installed="@seamPersistenceUnit@" name="wikiEntityManagerFactory" persistence-unit-name="wiki"/>
<core:ejb installed="@embeddedEjb@"/>
So either the EMF is started by Seam during WAR deployment (seamPersistenceUnit) and available as a component instance in application scope, or the EMF is deployed by the E-EJB3 container and bound to JNDI with the magic JBoss configuration property in persistence.xml.
The managed-persistence-context now needs to access the EMF polymorphically, no matter where it is bound. If you try the above code, you will see that the entity-manager-factory attribute always has precedence, and if it resolves to null, you get an NPE. Instead, the JNDI lookup should be attempted.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the seam-issues
mailing list