[seam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (SEAMFACES-50) Extra BeanManagerProviders in service file results in no BM found on beta-1

Shane Bryzak (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Wed Mar 30 03:47:38 EDT 2011


     [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMFACES-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Shane Bryzak updated SEAMFACES-50:
----------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: Future


> Extra BeanManagerProviders in service file results in no BM found on beta-1
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SEAMFACES-50
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMFACES-50
>             Project: Seam Faces
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Build & Distribution
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0.Alpha3
>            Reporter: Nicklas Karlsson
>             Fix For: Future
>
>
> The faces modules contains the service file for BeanManagerProvider that has
> org.jboss.weld.extensions.beanManager.DefaultJndiBeanManagerProvider
> org.jboss.weld.extensions.beanManager.JBossJndiBeanManagerProvider
> in addition to it's own 
> org.jboss.seam.faces.beanManager.FacesServletContextBeanManagerProvider
> Since the weld extensions also carry the Default/JBoss JNDI providers we end up with 5 providers for that dependency combination. For some reason (classloading?), in the beta1-AS Pete provided this is a problem - resulting in *no* BeanManagers being found (which results in a crash when the faces module SeamExternalContext is set up for the first time)
> Removing the JNDI based BeanManagerProviders from faces appears to help the issue itself but it leaves the faces module completely dependent on other modules for BM access

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


More information about the seam-issues mailing list