[security-dev] PicketLink restructure

[Boleslaw Dawidowicz]

I must say I'm quite pissed off… even yesterday I shared a link to one of configuration files in 1.4 branch with a consultants. We released twice last month… how could have it happened without any question?


On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow at redhat.com> wrote:

> Have you just removed picketlink-idm on github?
> 
> We are actively working on 1.4 branch and this is critical for EPP. Other branches are still maintenance for older versions of GateIn/EPP. I think I was fairly clear that we need those. 
> 
> This repo needs to be restored ASAP. 
> 
> On Oct 2, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> In the interests of presenting a clear message to our developers, one of the steps we'll be taking is to consolidate the various PicketLink projects into a single project and presenting this as the "go to" solution for application security.  For now I've merged the CDI and IDM subprojects (these are now submodules of the PicketLink project, with "CDI" renamed to "Core") and the plan is to eventually merge the social and federation modules also.
>> 
>> You can find the new GitHub repository here: https://github.com/picketlink (renamed from picketlink-cdi) and the picketlink-idm repository has now been deleted.  For anyone working on these modules, please use the new repository from now on.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Shane
>> _______________________________________________
>> security-dev mailing list
>> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20121002/1b04412f/attachment.html