[security-dev] PicketLink restructure

[Anil Saldhana]

Yes, we have local copies. We are going to reinstate the codebase.

On 10/03/2012 08:22 PM, Jason Porter wrote:
> Assuming Pedro still has his git repo somewhere (local hard drive, 
> github fork) it's not really gone and we can restore it, or at the 
> very least cherry-pick the commits.
>
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Anil Saldhana 
> <Anil.Saldhana at redhat.com <mailto:Anil.Saldhana at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     Shane,
>       did you throw away the JPA code that Pedro had done for almost a
>     month? Where is that code?
>
>     Code contributions have legal ramifications. We cannot just throw
>     away code and loss of history is deeply disturbing.
>
>     Regards,
>     Anil
>
>
>     On 10/03/2012 05:39 PM, Shane Bryzak wrote:
>>     There was a little bit of confusion over the legacy IDM code (I
>>     had forgotten that it had been migrated to the picketlink-idm
>>     repo on GitHub albeit under different branches) but this has been
>>     sorted out now, and I believe all the history for it is intact. 
>>     As for the temporary IDM implementation we have the final
>>     snapshot of it, however since then I've blown it away anyhow and
>>     started working on the proper implementation.  I don't think we
>>     need the history for the temporary stuff.
>>
>>     Agreed with the collective PL release.  As for the version
>>     number, did we ever do a 2.x release?  If so, then I agree we
>>     should update it to 3.x for the new project.
>>
>>     Shane
>>
>>     On 04/10/12 01:06, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>>     Shane,
>>>       ahh.  You could not wait a day or two. :)  I am wondering if
>>>     we could have retained history via some form of "git mv".
>>>
>>>     We should probably have PicketLink version as 3.0 for all the
>>>     code and rather than do individual releases, we can do a
>>>     collective PL3.x release.
>>>
>>>     Cheers.
>>>
>>>     On 10/02/2012 04:56 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz wrote:
>>>>     I restored our branches and synced with Shane on IM.
>>>>
>>>>     picketlink-idm/master will be nuked and only contain some
>>>>     README pointing to new locations
>>>>
>>>>     Current picketlink-idm repo will be kept for few more months at
>>>>     least and after we are in more calm situation with GateIn/EPP
>>>>     it will be renamed into picketlink-idm-legacy.
>>>>
>>>>     Things under control :)
>>>>
>>>>     Bolek
>>>>
>>>>     On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz
>>>>     <bdawidow at redhat.com <mailto:bdawidow at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>     I must say I'm quite pissed off... even yesterday I shared a
>>>>>     link to one of configuration files in 1.4 branch with a
>>>>>     consultants. We released twice last month... how could have it
>>>>>     happened without any question?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz
>>>>>     <bdawidow at redhat.com <mailto:bdawidow at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>     Have you just removed picketlink-idm on github?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     We are actively working on 1.4 branch and this is critical
>>>>>>     for EPP. Other branches are still maintenance for older
>>>>>>     versions of GateIn/EPP. I think I was fairly clear that we
>>>>>>     need those.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     This repo needs to be restored ASAP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     On Oct 2, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com
>>>>>>     <mailto:sbryzak at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     In the interests of presenting a clear message to our
>>>>>>>     developers, one of the steps we'll be taking is to
>>>>>>>     consolidate the various PicketLink projects into a single
>>>>>>>     project and presenting this as the "go to" solution for
>>>>>>>     application security.  For now I've merged the CDI and IDM
>>>>>>>     subprojects (these are now submodules of the PicketLink
>>>>>>>     project, with "CDI" renamed to "Core") and the plan is to
>>>>>>>     eventually merge the social and federation modules also.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     You can find the new GitHub repository here:
>>>>>>>     https://github.com/picketlink (renamed from picketlink-cdi)
>>>>>>>     and the picketlink-idm repository has now been deleted.  For
>>>>>>>     anyone working on these modules, please use the new
>>>>>>>     repository from now on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Thanks!
>>>>>>>     Shane
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     security-dev mailing list
>>>     security-dev at lists.jboss.org  <mailto:security-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     security-dev mailing list
>>     security-dev at lists.jboss.org  <mailto:security-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     security-dev mailing list
>     security-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:security-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jason Porter
> http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
> http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
>
> Software Engineer
> Open Source Advocate
> Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
>
> PGP key id: 926CCFF5
> PGP key available at: keyserver.net <http://keyserver.net>, 
> pgp.mit.edu <http://pgp.mit.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20121003/06f85188/attachment-0001.html