[security-dev] PicketLink Version and "Core" Module name

Bruno Oliveira bruno at abstractj.org
Thu Oct 18 11:43:25 EDT 2012

"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
Volenti Nihil Difficile

On Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:

> a) I am presuming we have agreement that the PicketLink version for the 
> consolidated workspace should be v3.x

+1 We're using picketlink-idm-restored now and I'm not comfortable with it.

We should get it merged sooner than later against the main picketlink repository. 
> b) Regarding the module name "core" that most of us want renamed to "cdi".
> I do not see issues with it called "core" as long as PL 2.x federation 
> users on non-ee environments upgrading to PL3 do not have a requirement 
> to have CDI/Weld jars. Ideally we cannot force users to require Weld 
> jars to run SAML on tomcat, for example.

I'm fine with either, we're building software, we can change if it doesn't work. 
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev at lists.jboss.org (mailto:security-dev at lists.jboss.org)
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20121018/c3f73fd9/attachment.html 

More information about the security-dev mailing list