[security-dev] PicketLink AS Subsystem
bburke at redhat.com
Tue Feb 19 10:06:03 EST 2013
A REST interface is orthogonal, IMO. For instance, you could have a
Java facade over your REST interface, then, your application code
doesn't even know if it is going remote or not to interact with the IDM.
On 2/19/2013 10:00 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
> The subsystem will be critical for AS8 Security. So we need to have a wider
> discussion on the subsystem design. At a bare minimum, we need a PL
> subsystem that exposes the IDM.
> On 02/19/2013 05:13 AM, Bolesław Dawidowicz wrote:
>> We are doing some prototyping with PicketBox and PicketLink 3. As part
>> of this it makes sense for use to put it in separate subystem in AS7.
>> There is existing PicketLink 2.x one here:
>> From what I learned from Anil while it is on the roadmap PicketLink 3.x
>> subsystem won't happens soon. I would like to discus requirements for it
>> as we may be able to contribute something - at least some initial work.
>> I would also like to discuss how independent PicketLink service should
>> be exposed and consumed in applications. Most natural way would be to
>> provide both CDI integration and REST interface. Any thoughts on that?
>> As part of our prototyping we would like to avoid investing time into
>> something that would duplicate existing functionality or go against
>> already agreed design.
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
More information about the security-dev