[security-dev] PicketLink AS Subsystem

Bolesław Dawidowicz bdawidow at redhat.com
Wed Feb 20 03:23:32 EST 2013


On 02/19/2013 02:26 PM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> I don't think that expose REST interfaces are a high priority at the moment (doable, but not a priority). But if you're interested in Anil and Pedro started something related, with the basics on picketlink-extensions (https://github.com/picketlink/picketlink-extensions/tree/master/core/src/main/java/org/picketlink/extensions/core/rest).
>

Thanks for pointing this out

> Currently I'm more concerned about the basics: HTTP basic & digest authentication + authorization on RESTful endpoints.
>
> --
> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
> -
> @abstractj
> -
> Volenti Nihil Difficile
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Bolesław Dawidowicz wrote:
>
>> I would also like to discuss how independent PicketLink service should
>> be exposed and consumed in applications. Most natural way would be to
>> provide both CDI integration and REST interface. Any thoughts on that?
>
>
>



More information about the security-dev mailing list