<div>-- </div><div><div>"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato</div><div>-</div><div>@abstractj</div><div>-</div><div>Volenti Nihil Difficile</div></div>
<p style="color: #A0A0A8;">On Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
<span><div><div><div>a) I am presuming we have agreement that the PicketLink version for the </div><div>consolidated workspace should be v3.x</div></div></div></span></blockquote><div>+1 We're using picketlink-idm-restored now and I'm not comfortable with it.</div><div><br></div><div>We should get it merged sooner than later against the main picketlink repository. </div><blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;"><span><div><div><div>b) Regarding the module name "core" that most of us want renamed to "cdi".</div><div>I do not see issues with it called "core" as long as PL 2.x federation </div><div>users on non-ee environments upgrading to PL3 do not have a requirement </div><div>to have CDI/Weld jars. Ideally we cannot force users to require Weld </div><div>jars to run SAML on tomcat, for example.</div></div></div></span></blockquote><div>I'm fine with either, we're building software, we can change if it doesn't work. </div><blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;"><span><div><div><div>_______________________________________________</div><div>security-dev mailing list</div><div><a href="mailto:security-dev@lists.jboss.org">security-dev@lists.jboss.org</a></div><div><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev</a></div></div></div></span>
</blockquote>
<div>
<br>
</div>