[shrinkwrap-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (SHRINKWRAP-329) Arquillian should fail-fast when adding the same resource twice to an archive made with ExplodedImporter.class
Aslak Knutsen (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Mon Sep 12 15:21:26 EDT 2011
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SHRINKWRAP-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12627954#comment-12627954 ]
Aslak Knutsen commented on SHRINKWRAP-329:
------------------------------------------
This is not controlled by Arquillian, but ShrinkWrap. Personally I would say it should just overwrite if it exists, that it is being silently ignored is a bug.
> Arquillian should fail-fast when adding the same resource twice to an archive made with ExplodedImporter.class
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SHRINKWRAP-329
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SHRINKWRAP-329
> Project: ShrinkWrap
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Geoffrey De Smet
> Priority: Minor
>
> This didn't fail fast for me:
> {code}
> @Deployment
> public static WebArchive createDeployment() {
> WebArchive webArchive = ShrinkWrap.create(ExplodedImporter.class, "guvnor-webapp-5.3.0-SNAPSHOT.war")
> .importDirectory(new File("target/guvnor-webapp-5.3.0-SNAPSHOT/")) // already contains WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/beans.xml
> .as(WebArchive.class)
> .addAsResource(new File("target/test-classes/META-INF/test-beans.xml"), "WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/beans.xml")
> ...
> return webArchive;
> }
> {code}
> Surprisingly, the second beans.xml didn't even overwrite the first one either. The second beans.xml was just ignored.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the shrinkwrap-issues
mailing list