[teiid-designer-dev] Teiid configuration in Designer

[John Doyle]

Just logged https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/TEIIDDES-175.  I'll link the Jira back to this discussion if the forums ever catch up.

Ramesh, like I said earlier, I've very much talking out of school in technical understanding of what I'm proposing, but can I infer from your response that Teiid exposes sufficient APIs to retain current functionality to accomplish what I suggest?

~jd

----- "John Verhaeg" <jverhaeg at redhat.com> wrote:

> But as far as I'm aware, we don't have a ticket for this yet.  Can you
>  
> log one that captures your thoughts?
> 
> On May 6, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Ramesh Reddy wrote:
> 
> > Well that is certainly the case going forward to have such
> modularity,
> > as this has been discussed before. However, that is not case today.
> > There needs to be huge re-work needs to be done in designer before
> we
> > can achieve this. Currently Designer knows too much about the
> Teiid's
> > configuration, that needs to be fixed such that it only
> communicates
> > only through the known public API like JDBC and Admin API.
> >
> > Ramesh..
> >
> > On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 11:35 -0400, John Doyle wrote:
> >> I'm throwing this idea out there with very little idea of how the 
> 
> >> links between Teiid and Designer function, but I think it would be 
> 
> >> cool and beneficial.
> >>
> >> AFAIK we don't have a user story abut how you update the version of
>  
> >> Teiid that is delivered with Designer.  I think that it would be  
> >> very cool if we exposed this cabability in designer similar to the 
> 
> >> way Installed JREs are exposed through the Preferences page.   
> >> Designer could come with a version of Teiid, but users could point 
> 
> >> Designer to other versions of Teiid installed on their system and 
> 
> >> choose to run with those.  One of the goals we have discussed is  
> >> that we don't want Designer to be wedded to a particular version of
>  
> >> Teiid.  Defining the links between to two in this manner would  
> >> force a contract and make it easy to test and validate that  
> >> Designer 6.X works with Teiid 6.X and 7.X, etc.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >> ~jd
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> teiid-designer-dev mailing list
> >> teiid-designer-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-designer-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > teiid-designer-dev mailing list
> > teiid-designer-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-designer-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> teiid-designer-dev mailing list
> teiid-designer-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-designer-dev