<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>I think that's a decent idea, however, our new VDB framework does not use EMF anymore, so our built-in "build" framework that utilizes "validation rules" may not work.<br><br>Currently we have no VDB-specific validation.<br><br>JPAV, do our validation rules have to be implemented via EMF? and/or can they be applied to a simple IResource (i.e. xxxx.vdb file)?<br><br>Barry<br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "John Doyle" <jdoyle@redhat.com><br>To: "Barry Lafond" <blafond@redhat.com><br>Cc: "teiid-dev" <teiid-dev@lists.jboss.org>, "teiid-designer-dev" <teiid-designer-dev@lists.jboss.org><br>Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:43:22 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central<br>Subject: Re: [teiid-designer-dev] Materialized Views<br><br><style>p { margin: 0; }</style><div style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>----- "Barry Lafond" <blafond@redhat.com> wrote:
<br>> <style>p { margin: 0; }</style><div style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">> All,<br>> <br>......<br>> That all said, would it be wrong to NOT treat these Materialization Physical models as dependencies? Users would be totally responsible for including them in a VDB containing the original virtual models?<br>> <br>> Comments, ideas?<br><br>While it certainly would be best to add them automatically like we do for other models, would it be possibly to flag a missing Materialization Physical model as a validation error on a VDB without changing the metamodel? Would that be good enough?<br><br>> <br>> Barry<br>> </div><br>> _______________________________________________
teiid-designer-dev mailing list
teiid-designer-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-designer-dev
</div></div></body></html>