[teiid-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (TEIID-1065) PropertyDefinition.getDisplayName() Should Agree With The Display Name Shown In JON

[Dan Florian (JIRA)]

    [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/TEIID-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12527352#action_12527352 ] 

Dan Florian commented on TEIID-1065:
------------------------------------

Seems like the "metadata defined on the managed property" needs to be fixed then. Not sure who is responsible for that. Can you help me there. And why isn't JON/JOPR using the metadata?

I like your idea of marking properties as being a Teiid property or not. Tools can then do what they want. For instance, Teiid Designer could mark the non-Teiid properties as expert and non-modifiable if they choose to not their users modify them.

> PropertyDefinition.getDisplayName() Should Agree With The Display Name Shown In JON
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEIID-1065
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/TEIID-1065
>             Project: Teiid
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: AdminApi
>    Affects Versions: 7.0
>         Environment: Teiid 7.0 M3
>            Reporter: Dan Florian
>            Assignee: Ramesh Reddy
>             Fix For: 7.0
>
>
> The display names of properties should be the same between JON and TEIID. For instance, the "jmx-invoker-name" property is displayed in JON as "Jmx Invoker Name" but in the PropertyDefinition the display name is "jmxInvokerName."

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira