[teiid-users] What should we call this artifact?

[Larry O'Leary]

On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 15:05 -0500, Ramesh Reddy wrote:
> To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been
> calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are
> building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular
> VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer!
> 
> I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are
> "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name for this,
> so that we all can refer it by the same name?

How about:
   Model-less VDB.
   Headless VDB
   SVDB (Source VDB)
   PVDB (Physical VDB)

-- 
Larry O'Leary <loleary at redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc.