[undertow-dev] Proposed Low Level Web Sockets API

[Stuart Douglas]

I think we should base the JSR356 support on a lower level fully async API. 

I don't think we should use this API as the basis for all our web socket support, as that will make it much more difficult to do non-spec enhancements. 

Stuart

jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 10:30 AM, Stuart Douglas wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> So I have just been thinking about the low level web socket API, and
>> basically I think it should look something like:
>
> So that is the lowest layer to implement is 
> http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=356 correct?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jean-Frederic