[undertow-dev] Undertow vs. Jetty perf. benchmark

[Jason Greene]

Sure. It was testing raw GET throughput (returning fixed content) of traditional Servlets using standalone Jetty vs standalone Undertow. Response size was 11b -> 1mb.

On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Norman Maurer <nmaurer at redhat.com> wrote:

> Do you have some more details on the benchmark?
> 
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: Jason Greene <jason.greene at redhat.com>
> An: Vojtech Juranek <vjuranek at redhat.com>
> CC: undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Gesendet: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 16:21:53 -0400 (EDT)
> Betreff: Re: [undertow-dev] Undertow vs. Jetty perf. benchmark
> 
> I did an internal comparison awhile back that had Undertow, depending on scenario, anywhere from 15 - 85% better throughput than Jetty 9.
> 
> On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Vojtech Juranek <vjuranek at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> there are some Undertow performance benchmarks like [1]. Is any perf. 
>> comparison between Undertow and Jetty available somewhere?
>> Thanks
>> Vojta
>> 
>> [1] http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r6&hw=ec2&test=plaintext_______________________________________________
>> undertow-dev mailing list
>> undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
> 
> --
> Jason T. Greene
> WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> undertow-dev mailing list
> undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
> 

--
Jason T. Greene
WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
JBoss, a division of Red Hat