[undertow-dev] awesome

[Stuart Douglas]

> BTW, do you know any standard headers I could use to forward security
> information?

Not really. We use SSL_CLIENT_CERT, SSL_CIPHER and SSL_SESSION_ID to forward certificate information to back end servers, but that is in no way standard (basically I just used the same headers that JBoss Web did). 

Stuart

> 
> On 11/21/2014 7:00 AM, Stuart Douglas wrote:
> > Also do you have any details posted somewhere about how you did it?
> >
> > Stuart
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Stuart Douglas" <sdouglas at redhat.com>
> >> To: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> >> Cc: undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> Sent: Friday, 21 November, 2014 7:06:43 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [undertow-dev] awesome
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> >>> To: undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>> Sent: Friday, 21 November, 2014 2:13:03 PM
> >>> Subject: [undertow-dev] awesome
> >>>
> >>> I couldn't believe how easy it was to create an http security proxy for
> >>> Keycloak using undertow.  Undertow was insanely modular and easy to
> >>> piece together how I wanted.  Great work guys.
> >>
> >> Awesome :-)
> >>
> >> Stuart
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Bill Burke
> >>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> >>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> undertow-dev mailing list
> >>> undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
> >>>
> >>
> 
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>