[undertow-dev] Jersey on Undertow, without servlets?

[Michael Hixson]

Thanks Stuart.

If grizzly2-http is any indication, this should be possible with
500-1000 lines of code.  That's not as bad as I thought it would be.

-Michael

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Stuart Douglas <sdouglas at redhat.com> wrote:
> I think you would need to implement your own container. Looking at https://github.com/jersey/jersey/tree/master/containers there are a few existing container implementation that don't use servlet, you could probably just base it off one of these.
>
> Stuart
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Michael Hixson" <michael.hixson at gmail.com>
>> To: undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 3:12:59 PM
>> Subject: [undertow-dev] Jersey on Undertow, without servlets?
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Has anyone run a Jersey application on Undertow, *without* using servlets?
>>
>> By "using servlets" I mean wrapping an
>> org.glassfish.jersey.server.ResourceConfig in an
>> org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer and deploying that with
>> undertow-servlets.  That's pretty easy to do; I don't have any
>> complaints about it.  My question comes mostly from curiosity.
>>
>> In my application, ServletContainer is the only connection to the
>> servlet API.  My naive view is that the application could be simpler
>> (in terms of the number of hidden gears turning to process requests)
>> and more efficient by avoiding the servlet API completely, and by only
>> using undertow-core.  Maybe I'm wrong, or maybe there is so much work
>> involved that no one in their right mind would try it.
>>
>> -Michael
>> _______________________________________________
>> undertow-dev mailing list
>> undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
>>