[undertow-dev] ByteBuffer Leak

Matt Clarkson mclarkson at eyeota.com
Thu Oct 27 01:18:12 EDT 2016


Great...thanks for the quick turnaround Stuart!

best,

MTC

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Stuart Douglas <sdouglas at redhat.com> wrote:

> In general it should not be an issue, as we use direct byte buffer by
> default. If you write a large heap buffer directly to a channel though
> you can still be hit by it.
>
> Stuart
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Matt Clarkson <mclarkson at eyeota.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello... does anybody here know whether undertow/xnio is exposed to this
> > "bug":
> >
> > http://www.evanjones.ca/java-bytebuffer-leak.html
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > MTC
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > undertow-dev mailing list
> > undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/attachments/20161027/cc865dc5/attachment.html 


More information about the undertow-dev mailing list