<div dir="ltr"><div><div>You are absolutely correct. Running with 1.1.0.Beta7-SNAPSHOT times out the connect attempt at 10s, as advertised.<br><br></div>Any idea when this is planned to be tagged for release?<br><br></div>
Thanks.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Stuart Douglas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sdouglas@redhat.com" target="_blank">sdouglas@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">This should be fixed in the 1.1 branch of Undertow. Can you try using Undertow upstream?<br>
<br>
Stuart<br>
<br>
Ryan Hermanson wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5">
Is there way to cancel an outstanding<br>
WebSocketContainer.<u></u>connectToServer(...) request ? A connection attempt<br>
to an offline server blocks a very long time (minutes), and debugging<br>
would indicate IoFuture<WebSocketChannel> seems unwilling to respect an<br>
interrupt/cancel from the main thread.<br>
<br>
IoFuture<WebSocketChannel> session = WebSocketClient.connect(<u></u>xnioWorker,<br>
ssl, bufferPool, OptionMap.EMPTY, path, WebSocketVersion.V13,<br>
clientNegotiation); //TODO: fix this<br>
WebSocketChannel channel = session.get();<br>
<br></div></div>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
undertow-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:undertow-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">undertow-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev</a><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote></div><br></div>