[weld-dev] And we have a result

[Arbi Sookazian]

et voila....

On 2009-11-30 IBM voted No with the following comment:
The current lack of portability between JSR 330 and JSR 299 applications
will create significant difficulties for the community. Application
developers who use patterns based on JSR 330 injection annotations and
proprietary injection mechanisms will experience integration issues when
taking advantage of JSR 299 contexts associated with JSF. Insufficient
attention has been paid to these details in the development of these
specifications and this will reflect poorly on the Java EE platform as a
whole. *Although IBM previously voted in support  of both JSR 299 and 330
with the clear expectation that the "SE/EE injection programming model must
be aligned into a single extensible programming model that defines a core
set of functionality for SE and extends that with EE functionality", this
has not yet been achieved. IBM will continue to support both expert groups
in the development of a single integrated and extensible injection
programming model. *

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls at gmail.com>wrote:

> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5017
>
> ---
> Nik
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20091201/85485bcb/attachment.html