[webbeans-dev] Re: Producer fields on EJBs

[Pete Muir]

Ok, I would think that some language in the spec to hint at this might  
be good, as instances of session beans elsewhere in the spec implies a  
EJB reference.

On 29 Mar 2009, at 18:04, Gavin King wrote:

> Yes, this is a good question - the 299 implementation would need
> direct integration with the EJB container for this. (Not the only
> place this is needed.)
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hey
>>
>> Not quite sure how this is supposed to work as everywhere we hold a
>> reference (proxy) to the EJB, and therefore don't have access to the
>> instance and therefore can't get hold of the fields. Any pointers?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pete Muir
>> http://www.seamframework.org
>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Gavin King
> gavin.king at gmail.com
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> http://hibernate.org
> http://seamframework.org

--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete