[webbeans-dev] standard name for conversation

[Dan Allen]

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:

> This is the case today (the spec requires this name, the TCK enforces it).


Ah, good.


>
>
> On 9 May 2009, at 00:28, Dan Allen wrote:
>
>  It would seem very useful if certain components had standard names. For
>> instance, it is quite common to consult the conversation object in JSF via
>> the EL. I would hate for different implementations to use different names
>> making the reference to the conversation non-portable. Would it be
>> reasonable to make javax.context.conversation the standard name?
>>
>> e.g. #{javax.context.conversation.longRunning}
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>>
-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan

NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week,
it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
caught in the spam filters.  Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
you feel that it did not reach my attention.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20090518/cd228e93/attachment.html